This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0022427808326588v1 46/1/73    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Armstrong, T. A. Articles by Armstrong, G. S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An Assessment of Scales Measuring Constructs in Tests of Criminological Theory Based on National Youth Survey Data

¹ Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas
² Indiana University of Pennsylvania

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: todd.armstrong{at}shsu.edu.

	Abstract

Researchers have utilized the National Youth Survey (NYS) data to test a variety of theoretical explanations of criminal behavior. Here, the authors offer an assessment of scales used in tests of criminological theory based on NYS data. The authors conducted this assessment to provide results informing future tests of theory. Their analyses focus on understanding the extent to which scales representative of different theories are actually based on the same item content. They test for two distinct processes that may explain this phenomenon. In the first process, scales measuring a given construct are attributed to different theories. In the second process, scales measuring different constructs are based on the same items. Results show that both of the processes described above contribute to the use of the same NYS items in scales that are attributed to different theories. To inform future tests of theory, the authors identify the sections of the NYS where each of these processes are most prevalent, in effect identifying the areas of the NYS that future tests of theory should treat with the greatest care. Based on the implications of each process identified above, the authors also offer some suggestions to strengthen future tests of theory using NYS data.

First published on November 18, 2008, doi:10.1177/0022427808326588

Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 2009;46:73.

A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?