Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 12, No. 1, 51-60 (1975)
DOI: 10.1177/002242787501200106

Some Implications for North Carolina of Recent Research in Juvenile Delinquency

Stevens H. Clarke

Institute of Government, University of North Carolina, Columbia University

In the late 1960's and early 1970's, "youth service bureau" programs were widely implemented as a solution to the delinquency problem. A re cent national study indicates that these programs' clients are predomi nantly juvenile status offenders such as truants and runaways rather than youth who commit criminal acts. The concentration on status of fenders is based on the desire (1) to reduce damaging involvement with the formal justice system; (2) to intervene early, on the theory that status offenses otherwise "escalate" into true criminal behavior; and (3) to avoid the greater risks involved in dealing with more serious juvenile of fenders. This policy needs to be re-examined in light of the Wolfgang- Figlio-Sellin cohort data. Boys in the cohort whose first offense was a sta tus offense were much less likely to recidivate than those whose first of fense was a criminal act. The data show no evidence whatever of "escala tion" and indicate that most boys who committed criminal acts did not be gin by committing status offenses. These findings plus the concentration of criminal offenses in a relatively small group of repeat offenders sug gests that concentrating resources on juveniles who have committed their first criminal offense may be a more effective means of reducing delin quency than concentrating on status offenders.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
C. L. Maxson, M. A. Little, and M. W. Klein
Police Response to Runaway and Missing Children: A Conceptual Framework for Research and Policy
Crime Delinquency, January 1, 1988; 34(1): 84 - 102.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
M. Leblanc and L. Biron
Status Offenses: a Legal Term Without Meaning: An Empirical Demonstration
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, January 1, 1980; 17(1): 114 - 125.
[Abstract]