Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holden, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Rehabilitative Sanctions for Drunk Driving: an Experimental Evaluation

Robert T. Holden

Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut

Under the Tennessee DWI Probation Follow-up Demonstration Project, 4,126 per sons arrested for drunk driving (DWI) in Memphis were classified as either social or problem driners and were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: control, probation supervision, education/therapy, or supervision plus education/therapy. Each client was followed up for at least two years after referral to the project. It was concluded that the treatment programs were not effective in reducing rearrests for DWI or for other misdemeanors and felonies. Arguments can be made that the treatment programs were inapproppriate for many of the project's clients. However, strong arguments can also be made that any such experiments, re gardless of the treatments tested, are unlikely to produce significant treatment ef fects because of other aspects of the sanctioning process.

Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 20, No. 1, 55-72 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/002242788302000105
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
J. R. Lilly, R. A. Ball, G. D. Curry, and J. McMullen
Electronic Monitoring of the Drunk Driver: A Seven-Year Study of the Home Confinement Alternative
Crime Delinquency, October 1, 1993; 39(4): 462 - 484.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
B. J. Morse and D. S. Elliott
Effects of Ignition Interlock Devices on DUI Recidivism: Findings from a Longitudinal Study in Hamilton County, Ohio
Crime Delinquency, April 1, 1992; 38(2): 131 - 157.
[Abstract]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
W. Chavkin
Mandatory Treatment for Drug Use During Pregnancy
JAMA, September 18, 1991; 266(11): 1556 - 1561.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
G. R. Wheeler and R. V. Hissong
Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Drunk Drivers: Beyond Incarceration
Crime Delinquency, January 1, 1988; 34(1): 29 - 42.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
S. E. Brown
The Reconceptualization of Viqjence in Criminal Justice Education Programs
Criminal Justice Review, May 1, 1986; 11(1): 34 - 42.
[Abstract]