Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LIPSEY, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 21, No. 4, 279-302 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/0022427884021004002

Is Delinquency Prevention a Cost-Effective Strategy? A California Perspective

MARK W. LIPSEY

To be cost-effective, delinquency prevention should yield savings to the law enforcement and juvenile justice system and, optionally, to victims, offsetting more than its costs. An analysis of the cost issues involved from the standpoint of local and state budgeting indicates that the benefit-cost position of prevention programs depends upon the delinquency risk of the clients chosen for treatment, and the success rate in preventing subsequent delinquency by those clients as well as the relative costs of the program itself. A simple model for the interplay of these various factors is developed and illustrated using data from the Los Angeles County delinquency prevention program. Even with conservative assumptions, delinquency prevention appears to be a cost-effective strategy, capable of producing savings to local and state government that outweigh its costs. Achieving that favorable benefit-cost position, however, is not assured for any given program. It requires selection of juvenile clients with significant delinquency risk, sustaining of a moderately high level of success in treating those clients, and containment of program costs. Representative data from the Los Angeles County program are used to estimate the performance required on these various factors if a prevention program is to justify its effort in terms of net cost savings to those responsible for funding juvenile justice in the community within which it operates.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, S. Brown, M. M. Moon, M. B. Blankenship, and B. K. Applegate
Public Support for Early Intervention Programs: Implications for a Progressive Policy Agenda
Crime Delinquency, April 1, 1998; 44(2): 187 - 204.
[Abstract]