This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by GROVES, W. B. Articles by SAMPSON, R. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Traditional Contributions to Radical Criminology

ROBERT J. SAMPSON

This article analyzes the causes of criminal behavior as portrayed in the three dominant models of traditional criminology—strain, cultural deviance, and social control—from the perspective of radical criminology. Specifically, we compare these traditional models to radical theory based on three derived criteria: (1) that social class plays an important role in the traditional theory in question, (2) that the theory employs a social-structural model of crime causation, and (3) that the theory offers a materialistic interpretation of the relationship between culture and social structure. Ranging from contributions that are fully compatible to those that provide fruitful possibilities for future research, we find that traditional theories—especially macro-level social control models—converge in crucial respects with radical criminology. We conclude that the ideological differences between radicals and traditionalists, in conjunction with the former's suspicion of positivism and the latter's narrow emphasis on individual-level explanations, have obfuscated the development of an integrated, structural model of crime causation.

Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 24, No. 3, 181-214 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0022427887024003002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. F. Greenberg The Weak Strength of Social Control Theory Crime Delinquency, January 1, 1999; 45(1): 66 - 81. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. A. SIMS Crime, Punishment, and the American Dream: Toward a Marxist Integration Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, February 1, 1997; 34(1): 5 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. B. GROVES and M. J. LYNCH Reconciling Structural and Subjective Approaches to the Study of Crime Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, November 1, 1990; 27(4): 348 - 375. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. L. Matsueda The Current State of Differential Association Theory Crime Delinquency, July 1, 1988; 34(3): 277 - 306. [Abstract]