Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOLMES, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by FARRELL, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Determinants of Charge Reductions and Final Dispositions in Cases of Burglary and Robbery

MALCOLM D. HOLMES

HOWARD C. DAUDISTEL

RONALD A. FARRELL

Despite an extensive literature on differential justice, relatively few studies have examined whether inequities occur in legal decisions that precede sentencing. This becomes a problem given the vast majority of criminal cases prosecuted in the United States are disposed of through guilty pleas to reduced charges. In an effort to address this issue, the current study examined legal, status, and resource determinants of both charge reductions and final dispositions in cases of burglary and robbery in two U.S. jurisdictions. While the analysis showed that social status influenced the acquisition of private counsel and pretrial release, resources that tended to favor defendants at final disposition, the expectation that charge reductions might be especially receptive to status influences was not supported. Only one direct status effect on charge reductions was obtained and no indirect influences appear to have been operating. Further, contrary to the dominant thesis, the direct effects of race/ethnicity on charge reductions and final dispositions point to less severe responses to minorities, responses that we suggest may have been the result of initial overcharging in cases of minority defendants.

Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 24, No. 3, 233-254 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0022427887024003004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
M. R. Williams
The Effect of Pretrial Detention on Imprisonment Decisions
Criminal Justice Review, September 1, 2003; 28(2): 299 - 316.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
M. D. Free Jr.
Race and Presentencing Decisions in the United States: A Summary and Critique of the Research
Criminal Justice Review, September 1, 2002; 27(2): 203 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
S. R. Maxwell and J. S. Davis
The Salience of Race and Gender in Pretrial Release Decisions: A Comparison Across Multiple Jurisdictions
Criminal Justice Policy Review, December 1, 1999; 10(4): 491 - 502.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
M. Killias
Criminality among Second-Generation Immigrants in Western Europe: A Review of the Evidence
Criminal Justice Review, May 1, 1989; 14(1): 13 - 42.
[Abstract]