This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by BELENKO, S. Articles by CHIN, K.-L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Criminal Justice Responses to Crack

JEFFREY FAGAN

KO-LIN CHIN

The past few years have seen heightened concern about the spread of the use and sale of smokable cocaine ("crack") and its effects on crime and public order. In particular, the criminal justice system has responded to these concerns with an unprecedented emphasis on apprehending street drug dealers and users in record numbers, overwhelming the courts and jails of many urban jurisdictions. The public perception that crack is a particularly dangerous and addictive drug, together with the growth of an unregulated street drug market, media accounts of crack-related violence, and the lack of treatment facilities, has placed pressure on the system to process crack arrests differently from other drug arrests. This study of the response of the New York City criminal justice system to the early stages of the crack "epidemic" is based on analyses of the 3,403 crack arrests that occurred between August and October 1986, including the characteristics of defendants, charges, case dispositions, and sentences. The comparison sample consisted of powdered cocaine arrests from 1983 to 1984. The results suggest that crack cases had a higher probability of pretrial detention, felony indictment, and jail sentence. Logit analyses of lower court disposition and the bail decision indicated that being charged with a crack-related offense was a relatively strong determinant of these case decisions compared to such traditional factors as prior criminal record.

Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 28, No. 1, 55-74 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0022427891028001004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. T. Chappell and S. R. Maggard Applying Black's Theory of Law to Crack and Cocaine Dispositions Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, June 1, 2007; 51(3): 264 - 278. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H.-E. Sung and S. Belenko From Diversion Experiment to Policy Movement: A Case Study of Prosecutorial Innovation Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, August 1, 2006; 22(3): 220 - 240. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. F. Parker and S. R. Maggard Structural Theories and Race-Specific Drug Arrests: What Structural Factors Account for the Rise in Race-Specific Drug Arrests Over Time? Crime Delinquency, October 1, 2005; 51(4): 521 - 547. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Mosher Predicting Drug Arrest Rates: Conflict and Social Disorganization Perspectives Crime Delinquency, January 1, 2001; 47(1): 84 - 104. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. PEUGH and S. BELENKO Substance-Involved Women Inmates: Challenges to Providing Effective Treatment The Prison Journal, March 1, 1999; 79(1): 23 - 44. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. G. Hebert Sentencing Outcomes of Black, Hispanic, and White Males Convicted Under Federal Sentencing Guidelines Criminal Justice Review, September 1, 1997; 22(2): 133 - 156. [Abstract]

				B. D. Johnson, A. Golub, and J. Fagan Careers in Crack, Drug Use, Drug Distribution, and Nondrug Criminality Crime Delinquency, July 1, 1995; 41(3): 275 - 295. [Abstract]

				S. Belenko, I. Mara-Drita, and J. E. McElroy Drug Tests and the Prediction of Pretrial Misconduct: Findings and Policy Issues Crime Delinquency, October 1, 1992; 38(4): 557 - 582. [Abstract]