Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ELLICKSON, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by BELL, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Challenges to Social Experiments: A Drug Prevention Example

PHYLLIS L. ELLICKSON

ROBERT M. BELL

Evaluations of school-based drug prevention programs have been plagued by problems that limited the validity of their findings. These limitations pose clear challenges for current prevention research. This article describes how a recent, multisite experiment conducted in 30 junior high schools met several of those challenges, specifically: evaluating the program in a variety of environments; achieving well-balanced experimental groups; implementing the program as designed; obtaining reliable outcome measures; and eliminating alternative explanations for the results. In most cases, multiple strategies were employed. Extensive analyses were conducted to assess how well the strategies worked; they indicated that each obstacle was overcome. This success implies several lessons for future experiments that are generally applicable to field studies conducted with schools and other organizations. Of particular importance are the guidelines for recruiting institutions from diverse communities and maintaining their cooperation over several years and the techniques for facilitating faithful program delivery and monitoring the implementation process. Recommended design and analysis features include using more than simple random assignment to achieve a balanced design, and employing control variables to rule out alternative explanations of the results—even under conditions of substantial pretreatment equivalence.

Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 29, No. 1, 79-101 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0022427892029001005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
R. Boruch, H. May, H. Turner, J. Lavenberg, A. Petrosino, D. de Moya, J. Grimshaw, and E. Foley
Estimating the Effects of Interventions That are Deployed in Many Places: Place-Randomized Trials
American Behavioral Scientist, January 1, 2004; 47(5): 608 - 633.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
P. L. Ellickson, R. M. Bell, and E. R. Harrison
Changing Adolescent Propensities to Use Drugs: Results from Project ALERT
Health Educ Behav, July 1, 1993; 20(2): 227 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]