This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by CRUTCHFIELD, R. D. Articles by PITCHFORD, S. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Analytical and Aggregation Biases in Analyses of Imprisonment: Reconciling Discrepancies in Studies of Racial Disparity

GEORGE S. BRIDGES

SUSAN R. PITCHFORD

The literature on racial disparities in criminal justice processing is unclear about whether Black defendants are treated differently from White defendants. Although some studies find no difference in treatment, others report that Blacks are treated significantly more harshly than Whites; still other studies find that Black defendants are treated more leniently. This analysis examines three methodological procedures: (1) the selection of single or multiple points in the criminal justice system for study, (2) the number of jurisdictions included in studies, and (3) the level of aggregation of aggregation of jurisdictions used in studies of racial disparities. The authors conclude that some of the ambiguity reported in this literature can be traced to studies of single or few jurisdictions, single decision points in criminal justice processing, and to inappropriate aggregation.

Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 31, No. 2, 166-182 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0022427894031002005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. R. Piquero and R. W. Brame Assessing the Race-Crime and Ethnicity-Crime Relationship in a Sample of Serious Adolescent Delinquents Crime Delinquency, July 1, 2008; 54(3): 390 - 422. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. DeLeon-Granados, W. Wells, and R. Binsbacher Arresting Developments: Trends in Female Arrests for Domestic Violence and Proposed Explanations Violence Against Women, April 1, 2006; 12(4): 355 - 371. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. D. Walters Incremental Validity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles as a Predictor of Continuous and Dichotomous Measures of Recidivism Assessment, March 1, 2005; 12(1): 19 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. L. AUSTIN and M. D. ALLEN Racial Disparity in Arrest Rates as an Explanation of Racial Disparity in Commitment to Pennsylvania's Prisons Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, May 1, 2000; 37(2): 200 - 220. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. P. CRAMER Variables That Predict Verdicts in Domestic Violence Cases J Interpers Violence, November 1, 1999; 14(11): 1137 - 1150. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. D. GOTTFREDSON and G. R. JARJOURA Race, Gender, and Guidelines-Based Decision Making Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, February 1, 1996; 33(1): 49 - 69. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Pope and T. Clear Editors' Introduction Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, May 1, 1994; 31(2): 132 - 134. [PDF]