This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by PATERNOSTER, R. Articles by PIQUERO, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Reconceptualizing Deterrence: An Empirical Test of Personal and Vicarious Experiences

ALEX PIQUERO

In a recent article, Stafford and Warr (1993) presented a reconceptualization of the deterrence doctrine where general deterrence is taken to be the result of persons' vicarious experiences. Such vicarious experiences include, among other things, knowledge of the criminal activity of others and the consequences or lack of consequences of that activity. Specific deterrence is taken to be the result of persons' own personal experiences. These personal experiences include, among other things, own experience with punishment and punishment avoidance. In their reconceptualized deterrence theory, persons may concurrently be subject to both general and specific deterrent effects, some persons may be affected more by one type of deterrence than the other, and the two types of deterrent effects may reinforce one another. In addition, they argue that their version of deterrence theory promises some insight into current controversies in the literature. In this article, the authors first review and expand Stafford and Warr's reconceptualization of deterrence, and then subject some central hypotheses to empirical test. Although the authors' data are modest and cannot test all of the implications of Stafford and Warr's argument, the findings indicate that Stafford and Warr's reconceptualization promises to be a fruitful line of inquiry for those interested in the development of deterrence theory.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. E. Wolfe, G. E. Higgins, and C. D. Marcum Deterrence and Digital Piracy: A Preliminary Examination of the Role of Viruses Social Science Computer Review, August 1, 2008; 26(3): 317 - 333. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. K. Matthews and R. Agnew Extending Deterrence Theory: Do Delinquent Peers Condition the Relationship between Perceptions of Getting Caught and Offending? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, May 1, 2008; 45(2): 91 - 118. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. J. Rebellon Do Adolescents Engage in Delinquency to Attract the Social Attention of Peers? An Extension and Longitudinal Test of the Social Reinforcement Hypothesis Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, November 1, 2006; 43(4): 387 - 411. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. A. Jacobs A Typology of Street Criminal Retaliation Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, August 1, 2004; 41(3): 295 - 323. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. R. Corrado, I. M. Cohen, W. Glackman, and C. Odgers Serious and Violent Young Offenders' Decisions to Recidivate: An Assessment of Five Sentencing Models Crime Delinquency, April 1, 2003; 49(2): 179 - 200. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Pogarsky and A. R. Piquero Can Punishment Encourage Offending? Investigating The "resetting" Effect Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, February 1, 2003; 40(1): 95 - 120. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. PIQUERO and R. PATERNOSTER An Application of Stafford and Warr's Reconceptualization of Deterrence to Drinking and Driving Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, February 1, 1998; 35(1): 3 - 39. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. D. FOGLIA Perceptual Deterrence and the Mediating Effect of Internalized Norms among Inner-City Teenagers Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, November 1, 1997; 34(4): 414 - 442. [Abstract] [PDF]