Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiesner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Capaldi, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Relations of Childhood and Adolescent Factors to Offending Trajectories of Young Men

Margit Wiesner, Ph.D.

Department of Psychology at UAB.

Deborah M. Capaldi, Ph.D.

Oregon Social Learning Center and the Principal Investigator of the Oregon Youth Study.

Previous research has emphasized the importance of heterogeneity in offense trajectories. Using data from the Oregon Youth Study, a longitudinal study of at-risk boys interviewed annually from ages 9 to 10 years to ages 23 to 24 years, this study examined childhood and adolescent covariates of observed offending trajectory classes. Six trajectory classes were identified using the latent growth mixture modeling approach: chronic high-level, chronic low-level, decreasing high-level, decreasing low-level, rare, and nonoffenders. Multinomial logistic regressions revealed that nonoffenders, rare offenders, and chronic high-level offenders were distinguished by individual, family, and peer factors measured in childhood and adolescence. Only adolescent covariates (deviant peers, various problem behaviors) distinguished among trajectories of adolescents who engaged in substantive amounts of offending behavior. Overall, there was more specificity than commonality in correlates of distinctive offending trajectories.

Key Words: offending • trajectories • life span

Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 40, No. 3, 231-262 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0022427803253802


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
M. Wiesner, H. K. Kim, and D. M. Capaldi
History of Juvenile Arrests and Vocational Career Outcomes for At-Risk Young Men
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, February 1, 2010; 47(1): 91 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
V. van der Geest, A. Blokland, and C. Bijleveld
Delinquent Development in a Sample of High-Risk Youth: Shape, Content, and Predictors of Delinquent Trajectories from Age 12 to 32
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, May 1, 2009; 46(2): 111 - 143.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth JusticeHome page
H. Kemshall
Risks, Rights and Justice: Understanding and Responding to Youth Risk
Youth Justice, April 1, 2008; 8(1): 21 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
D. M. Vandiver
A Prospective Analysis of Juvenile Male Sex Offenders: Characteristics and Recidivism Rates as Adults
J Interpers Violence, May 1, 2006; 21(5): 673 - 688.
[Abstract] [PDF]