Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weidner, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Terrill, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Test of Turk’s Theory of Norm Resistance Using Observational Data on Police-Suspect Encounters

Robert R. Weidner

Department of Sociology-Anthropology at the University of Minnesota Duluth.

William Terrill

College of Criminal Justice at Northeastern University.

Turk’s theory of norm resistance explains how authority-subject relations can be structured in manners that have different probabilities of overt conflict (norm resistance). Building on previous research by Lanza-Kaduce and Greenleaf, this study uses data collected as part of an observational study of the police in Indianapolis, Indiana, and St. Petersburg, Florida, to examine Turk’s theory as it relates to conflict in police-suspect encounters. It examines three hypotheses derived from the theory of norm resistance, using multivariate statistical techniques to control for several factors either posited or empirically shown in previous research to influence overt conflict. Two of the three hypotheses are supported. Consistent with prior research, organization and sophistication of police and suspects are significant predictors of overt conflict. However, the hypothesis that conflict will be less likely when officers’ positional authority is reinforced by race, age, sex, and wealth deference norms is not supported.

Key Words: conflict theory • police use of force • norm resistance

Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 42, No. 1, 84-109 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0022427804266543


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Contemporary Criminal JusticeHome page
M. Norris, C. Birkbeck, and L. G. Gabaldon
Social Geometry and Force: A Partial Test of Black's Theory of Law With Mexican, U.S., and Venezuelan Police
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, November 1, 2006; 22(4): 324 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary Criminal JusticeHome page
B. Liang and H. Lu
Conducting Fieldwork in China: Observations on Collecting Primary Data Regarding Crime, Law, and the Criminal Justice System
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, May 1, 2006; 22(2): 157 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]