This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Unnever, J. D. Articles by Cullen, F. T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Christian Fundamentalism and Support for Capital Punishment

Mississippi State University

Francis T. Cullen

University of Cincinnati

Few public policy issues have inflamed passions as consistently and as strongly as the debate over capital punishment. Religious denominations have been deeply involved on both sides of the issue, drawing both on teachings and traditions of justice and on those that emphasize the dignity of human life. Scholarly researchers have investigated the role that religious beliefs play in shaping sentiments toward crime control policies, with a particular focus on the relationship between belonging to a Christian fundamentalist denomination and support for the death penalty. Researchers have reasoned that Christian fundamentalists should be more likely to support capital punishment than other more moderate denominations because they hold conservative religious beliefs that justify the use of the death penalty. Using 1998 data from the General Social Survey, the authors initially show that contrary to common views, Christian fundamentalist affiliation is unrelated to support for capital punishment. Subsequent analyses reveal, however, that this null relationship is not straightforward but complex: fundamentalists embrace certain religious beliefs and involvement that both increase and decrease punitiveness. The study thus suggests that understanding the impact of religion on crime control attitudes potentially requires disentangling countervailing effects of different features of religiosity.

Key Words: death penalty • Christian fundamentalism • punitiveness

Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 43, No. 2, 169-197 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0022427805280067


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. D. Unnever and F. T. Cullen Empathetic identification and punitiveness: A middle-range theory of individual differences Theoretical Criminology, August 1, 2009; 13(3): 283 - 312. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. D. Unnever, M. L. Benson, and F. T. Cullen Public Support for Getting Tough on Corporate Crime: Racial and Political Divides Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, May 1, 2008; 45(2): 163 - 190. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Shanhe Jiang and Jin Wang Correlates of Support for Capital Punishment in China International Criminal Justice Review, March 1, 2008; 18(1): 24 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. D. Unnever and F. T. Cullen Reassessing the Racial Divide in Support for Capital Punishment: The Continuing Significance of Race Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, February 1, 2007; 44(1): 124 - 158. [Abstract] [PDF]