|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Victim–Offender Racial Dyads and Clearance of Lethal and Nonlethal Assault
Aki Roberts*
and
Christopher J. Lyons
University of New Mexico
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: akit116{at}unm.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Previous clearance research provides an incomplete test of theories emphasizing the role of both victim and offender status in police discretion. Using National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) data, we investigate the impact of both victims and offenders race, and, in particular, victim–offender racial dyads on homicide clearance by arrest, using event history (survival) analysis, so that time to clearance and censoring are considered. We also compare models for homicide clearance with those for aggravated assault. For homicides, results indicate that incidents with non-white offenders are more likely to be cleared by arrest than those with white offenders, regardless of victims race. In contrast, for aggravated assault, dyads are important: incidents involving white victims and offenders are most likely to be cleared, with incidents involving non-white parties least likely to be cleared. Furthermore, the impact of victim–offender racial dyads on clearance is smaller for homicide than for aggravated assault.
First published on May 1, 2009, doi:10.1177/0022427809335168
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 2009;46:301.
A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2009

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|